No Evidence of Moral License in a Lab Bribe Task

  • Abbink, K. & Serra, D. Anti-Corruption Policies: Lessons from the Lab. in New advances in experimental research on corruption. Research in experimental economics (eds. Serra, D. & Wantchekon, L.) 77–115 (Emerald Group Publishing, 2012).

  • Becker, GS Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. J. Polit. Econ. 76169-217 (1968).

    Google Scholar article

  • Draca, M. & Machin, S. Crime and economic incentives. Ann. Rev. Econ. seven389-408 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Gerlach, P., Teodorescu, K. & Hertwig, R. Truth about lies: a meta-analysis of dishonest behavior. Psychol. Bull. 1451–44 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Hilbig, BE & Hessler, CM What’s Behind: How the Distance Between Truth and Falsehood Leads to Dishonesty. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49263–266 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • Mazar, N., Amir, O. & Ariely, D. The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Mark. Res. 45633–644 (2008).

    Google Scholar article

  • Thielmann, I. & Hilbig, BE No gain without pain: The psychological costs of dishonesty. J.Econ. Psychol. 71126-137 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Köbis, NC, Verschuere, B., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Rand, D. & Shalvi, S. Intuitive honesty versus dishonesty: meta-analytic evidence. Perspective. Psychol. Science. 14778–796 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Ayal, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R. & Ariely, D. Three Principles for REVISING People’s Unethical Behavior. Perspective. Psychol. Science. ten738–741 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Schild, C., Heck, DW, Ścigała, KA & Zettler, I. Revisiting REVISE: (Re)Testing the Single and Combined Effects of Recall, Visibility, and Self-Engagement Manipulations on Cheating Behavior. J.Econ. Psychol. 75102161 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Moore, C. Moral Disengagement. Running. Notice. Psychol. 6199-204 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R. & Ayal, S. Selfish justifications doing harm and feeling moral. Running. Real. Psychol. Science. 24125-130 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Shalvi, S., Eldar, O. & Bereby-Meyer, Y. Honesty takes time (and lacks justification. Psychol. Science. 231264-1270 (2012).

    Google Scholar article

  • Kline, R., Galeotti, F. & Orsini, R. When Foul Play Seems Fair: Dishonesty in Response to Violations of Just Deserts. Quadruple. – Work. Porridge. EHR No. 920(2014).

  • Pittarello, A., Leib, M., Gordon-Hecker, T. & Shalvi, S. Justifications shape ethical blind spots. Psychol. Science. 26794–804 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, MJ & De Dreu, CK Justified Ethics: Observing Desired Counterfactuals Changes Perceptions and Ethical Behaviors. Organ. Behavior Hmm. Decide. Treat. 115181-190 (2011).

    Google Scholar article

  • Shalvi, S., Handgraaf, MJ & De Dreu, CK Ethical maneuvers: why people avoid major and minor lies. Br. J.Manag. 2216-27 (2011).

    Google Scholar article

  • Dana, J., Loewenstein, G. & Weber, R. Ethical Immunity: How People Violate Their Own Moral Standards Without Feeling That They Do. in Behavioral Business Ethics: Shaping an Emerging Field (eds. Cremer, DD & Tenbrunsel, AT) 201–219 (Routledge, 2012).

  • Gross, J., Leib, M., Offerman, T. & Shalvi, S. Ethical free riding: when honest people find dishonest partners. Psychol. Science. 291956-1968 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • Merritt, AC, Effron, DA & Monin, B. Moral Self-Licensure: When Being Good Sets Us Free From Being Bad. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 4344-357 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R. & Medin, DL Sinner Saints and Sinner Saints: The Paradox of Moral Self-Regulation. Psychol. Science. 20523–528 (2009).

    Google Scholar article

  • Khan, U. & Dhar, R. Effect of licensing in consumer choice. J. Mark. Res. 43259–266 (2006).

    Google Scholar article

  • Tanner, RJ & Carlson, KA Unrealistic Optimistic Consumers: A Selective Hypothesis Test Accounts for Optimism in Predictions of Future Behavior. J.Consum. Res. 35810–822 (2009).

    Google Scholar article

  • Blanken, I., Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M. & Meijers, MH Three attempts to replicate the moral license effect. Soc. Psychol. 45232-238 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • Vranka, MA & Bahník, Š. Predictors of bribes: the role of size and personality of bribes. Front. Psychol. 91511 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • Bahník, Š & Vranka, MA Experimental test of the effects of probability and size of punishment on the decision to accept a bribe. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 97101813 (2022).

    Google Scholar article

  • Bahnik, S. & Vranka, MA Probabilistic prejudice does not increase selfish behavior in a bribe lab task. (2022). Available at: https://psyarxiv.com/t6bm8

  • Bahnik, S. & Vranka, MA Reward perception, but not reward inequality, is associated with increased bribery in a laboratory task. (2022). Available on SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4040000

  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. (2014). Available on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.

  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, PB & Christensen, RH Pack lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed-effects models. J. Stat. Software 821–26 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Barr, DJ Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Front. Psychol. 4328 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., and Baayen, H. Parsimonious mixed models. (2015). Available on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967.

  • Gomila, R. Logistics or linear? Estimation of causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150700–709 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • Mullen, E. & Monin, B. Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. A. Rev. Psychol. 67363–385 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • Kristofferson, K., White, K. & Peloza, J. The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Symbolic Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action. J.Consum. Res. 401149-1166 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • Greene, M. & Low, K. Public integrity, private hypocrisy, and the effect of moral license. Soc. Personal Behavior. 42391–400 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • Rotella, A. & Barclay, P. Failure to reproduce moral license and moral cleansing in an online experience. Personal. Individual To differ. 161109967 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • Urban, J., Bahník, Š & Braun Kohlová, M. Green consumption doesn’t make people cheat: three attempts to replicate the moral license effect due to pro-environmental behavior. J. About. Psychol. 63139–147 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Urban, J., Braun Kohlová, M. & Bahník, Š. No evidence of intra-domain moral license in the environmental field. About. Behaviour 531070-1094 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • Blanken, I., Ven, N. & Zeelenberg, M. A meta-analytic review of moral license. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41540-558 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Simbrunner, P. & Schlegelmilch, BB Moral licence: a culturally moderated meta-analysis. Managed. Rev. Q. 67201–225 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Kuper, N. & Bott, A. Has evidence for moral license been inflated by publication bias?. Meta-Psych. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.878 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Comments are closed.